Friday, June 10, 2011

funny golf_16

images ambrosio hair color 2010. funny golf_16. Skandar Keynes Pictures:
  • Skandar Keynes Pictures:


  • maxy
    10-16 01:19 PM
    sounds good...thanks

    look at your labor app... it states your proffered wage, job description etc. those are the terms and conditions... you can still get an EVL from your employer and have your lawyer (or have yourself) write a letter explaining how the EVL covers terms and conditions on the labor cert. in any case, this is a really stupid and unenforceable rfe... i mean how can the new employer even know whats in the labor and i-140? and without knowing that how can an employer "indicate" any compliance with t&c of labor and 140? i think you should be fine with just a plain evl that matches your job description and salary... at most, you can write a letter saying that "yeah the t&c continues to be valid".

    my 2 cents.




    wallpaper Skandar Keynes Pictures: funny golf_16. quotes for a brother
  • quotes for a brother


  • seahawks
    06-26 02:39 PM
    While filing for my wife's G-325A form, her last name was filled in first name and first name as last name. We got our FP notice yesterday and thats when I went back and reviewed all the forms I filed. I was wondering if any of you know what can be done so that an honest mistake can be corrected?

    Any input appreciated. I understand it is for information purpose only and not many of us are attorneys, so no disclosure required :)




    funny golf_16. girlfriend
  • girlfriend


  • SAPGURU
    07-11 03:12 PM
    Gurus,

    Here is my situation.

    Labor filed with company A in April 2006 and I-140 EB2 approved in May 2007. Could not file I-485 last year due to personal reasons.

    Changed the Job to company B in Sep 2007.Company B filed PERM EB2 in Feb 2008 and got approved in Aril 2008. I-140 filed in June 2008 with priority date recapture request and still pending.

    My 6th year of H1B is expiring in March 2009.

    My question is, can I file my I-485 based on my previously approved EB2 I140.

    What should be best approach for me? Any help will be greatly appreciated.




    2011 quotes for a brother funny golf_16. third world countries
  • third world countries


  • admin
    03-15 01:22 PM
    this person is bringing some valid points to ponder. People please go through her posting and i agree with her regarding the numbers is still 10% only for india. we need to fight for removing the per country limit, or else, we may probably be in this retrogression mess for quite sometime.

    eb3retro,

    Your concerns are well placed. Please be rest assured that we're working on reinstating the AC21 clause on per country limits.

    Due to the sensitive nature of lobbying, we're sorry that we will not be able to divulge any more detailed information.



    more...

    funny golf_16. hot Short
  • hot Short


  • permfiling
    12-10 01:03 AM
    My cousin took a offer from a employer in CA few months ago who did her H1 transfer but the condition mentioned in the agreement is that

    In the event the employee voluntarily resigns or her employment is terminated for performance or cause prior to 4 years, employee agrees to reimburse the "Employer" for the full amount of legal, administrative and filing fees associated with the sponsorship of the employee's work visas as permitted by law.

    The employer won't do premium processing so my cousin paid $1000 on her own but she had to travel outside the country to canada to get a new I-94. The employer's law firm filed the paper work with canada embassy in US to get a canadian visa.

    Now my cousin got her GC through her hubby which her employer does not know. She is debating if she needs to inform her manager and company as they might ask her to sign any agreement or give back H1 fees.

    The employment laws in CA are different so how can she move (if moves within 4 yrs) to another company without paying anything or a little fee to the employer. I told her that H1-B fees are not too high maybe around $4000.00 so the employer will have to spend lot of money on the lawyer's to go to court to suit her if she left say after 2 years of employment as she feels that the agreement is one sided considering the time line.




    funny golf_16. ounce
  • ounce


  • santosh19
    10-31 02:08 PM
    What confuses me is or are you saying that calfornia service center no more process the H1-B extension. But when you go to processing time in USCIS website it still shows you that they process H1-B extension
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=CSC



    more...

    funny golf_16. black flower wallpaper.
  • black flower wallpaper.


  • prom2
    10-02 09:07 PM
    So ND definitely matters. Check your position in queue using ND. Not RD.

    So in my opinion with current situation PD matters in the end. Luck matters first. :(

    I am agree with you.




    2010 girlfriend funny golf_16. ambrosio hair color 2010.
  • ambrosio hair color 2010.


  • GC092003
    04-13 12:50 PM
    I have same concerned. I have been waiting for too long to get my GC procee done. I can't live with current employer any longer. I am waiting for 1-485 to be filled. My PD is sept 03. Do you guys have any feeling if we can file it before this summer (like July)? Another concern is based on current situation with USCIS, it is about 8 month wait for I-485 to be processed. As you mentioned, it might be longer waiting time for this process since many people who had waited, will be filing. Please give me your feeling of feasibility date. Thanx.



    more...

    funny golf_16. emo love hands. emo love
  • emo love hands. emo love


  • kumarh1b
    01-28 05:16 PM
    Can some please advice me how to proceed further Please find the denial notice for your reference. All your inputs means a lot to me. Please help me and guide in proper direction.


    on Nov 19,2009, the petitioner responded by submitting a copy of a Contract or consulting Services agreement betwwen the petitioner and another software consulting firm, Company X-Which will further Contract the benificiary's services with other firms needing computer related positions to complete thier projects - to show that the petitioner has work for the beneficiary.

    However, without valid contracts between CompanyX and the actual end-client firm ultimately involved with the eneficiary's computer related duties, the evidence does not establish the work to be completed; that the duties to be performed are those of a systems administrator and thus a specialty occupation Position and that the work will be avilable for the beneficiary.

    The present record fails to demonstrate the specific duties the beneficiary would perform under contract for petitioners clients.The court in defensorv.meissner,201F.3d 384 (5th cir.2000) held that for purposes of determining whether apreferred positions is a specialty occupation,a petitioner acting ina similar manner as the present petitioner is merely a "token employer", while the entity for which the services are to be performed is the "more relevant employer". the defensor court recognized that evidence of the client companies job requirements is critical where the work to be performed is for an entity other than the petitioner. Accordingly, the court held that the legacy immigration and Naturalization service ( Service now CIS) had reasonably interpreted the Act and regulations to require that a petitioner produce evidence that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation on the basis of the requirements imposed by the entities using the beneficiary's services.

    As Such, the petitioner has not established that the duties of the proferred position for the beneficiary require a speciality occupation and that it has sufficient work for the required priod of intended employment. There for the beneficiary is ineligible for classificationas a specialty occupation worker.

    Pursuant to INA 291, the burden of the proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Here that burden has been met.

    Consequently, the petiton is hereby denied.




    hair third world countries funny golf_16. toyota hilux 2011 interior.
  • toyota hilux 2011 interior.


  • pasupuleti
    09-25 05:08 PM
    I got denied by discover credit card due to not having a green card.
    They said, it is just their policy that they won't give credit cards to
    people who don't have green cards.
    I could't co-sign my friends student loan application as i did't have a green card. They said, i have to be Permanent legal resident to co-sign.

    Though i have a mortgage now, my first mortagage application got denied on same grounds.

    Apparently fannie mae guildelines stipulates that H1B(foriegn investment) needs to put 60% down to get a mortgage loan.

    But most of the lenders do mortgages anyways even for the people who does't have a ssn:).



    No one has ever been denied mortgage because their green card is pending, all other things (credit record, finances etc) being equal...that would constitute housing discrimintaion...

    Just a thought, especially in response to those (and there are some on this forum) who feel discriminated in this country and compare their situation to that of exploited laborers in some podunk land...



    more...

    funny golf_16. margaret bourke white.
  • margaret bourke white.


  • GCWhru
    08-20 11:41 AM
    We are also in the same situation. Mine got approved on Aug 11th but no LUD on spouse's case.

    We had a Infopass appointment today, very nice IO informed us that NC and BC are cleared and case is still pending at TSC.

    He asked me to call 1800 and open a status inquiry (SR), but I requested him to open one for me, since I have/had very tough time with 1800. He was kind enough to open a SR and gave me the reference number too. He also informed me that I will be receiving a mail from USCIS within 30 days explaining the status of the case.




    hot hot Short funny golf_16. lung cancer ribbon.
  • lung cancer ribbon.


  • desi3933
    06-25 02:18 PM
    I agree. The argument that the AOS applicant doesn't need to have a job now is very aggressive and should only be used if absolutely necessary. If there is any chance of finding a new job soon, the first step would be to ask for more time to respond to the RFE.

    Thanks Elaine.

    My understanding is that, from legal point of view, the conditions for job offer must be maintained at all times while I-485 is pending. If there is a time when Job offer, that is same/similar to I-140 petition, is not available then the pending I-485 application can be denied just on this basis alone.

    Could you please share your views on this.


    .



    more...

    house adolescence santrock 13th funny golf_16. hairstyles Skandar Keynes
  • hairstyles Skandar Keynes


  • royus77
    07-17 10:29 PM
    Hi,
    My I-140 approved in TSC( premium processing)
    My Attorney sent my I-485 on July 2 to TSC
    my labor approved from Wisconsin
    but I read somewhere all applications needs to go to NSC , is it true?
    I greatly appreciate your help


    You are fine. I 485 should go where I 140 was approved.USCIS will internally transfer the applications until Aug 30 if they were sent to wrong processng center( Check the accuracy of date)

    http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrele...ling062107.pdf




    tattoo ounce funny golf_16. lil wayne new look
  • lil wayne new look


  • manish1905
    10-06 04:02 PM
    Hi Manish,
    I hope everything goes well with you.
    Did the officials call you or come to see you in person?

    yes the official did came in person at my work without any notice.He even took mu picture at my desk.it was hell of a surprice.He even wanted talk with my Supervisor but he was on vacation that day.



    more...

    pictures black flower wallpaper. funny golf_16. more.
  • more.


  • gc_kaavaali
    12-08 01:33 PM
    Hi guys,
    IV need contributions to invest in the omnibus bill Lobbying efforts.. for more details look at below thread...

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15905




    dresses lung cancer ribbon. funny golf_16. more.
  • more.


  • vejella
    08-01 11:07 PM
    2008 quota can never be used in 2007.

    I mean most of the 2008 quote WILL BE used not already been used..



    more...

    makeup emo love hands. emo love funny golf_16. adolescence santrock 13th
  • adolescence santrock 13th


  • mariusp
    02-22 09:28 PM
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
    https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=TSC

    TSC
    485: went from May 24 to April 10, 2007 :(
    140: June 23, 2007
    NSC
    485: July 30, 3007
    140: Jan 22, 2007




    girlfriend lil wayne new look funny golf_16. adolescence santrock 13th
  • adolescence santrock 13th


  • saimrathi
    07-17 02:58 PM
    This is from Logiclife.. all hope isnt lost yet

    The latest update we received is the the annoucement to be made soon will be as follows:

    1. DHS will withdraw it decision and act according to original bulletin released in July which had EB dates current for everyone except EB-other worker category.

    2. The July bulletin (original one released on June 12th) will remain effective for 30 days more and will be effective all the way thru August 17th.

    This is good news. It will be announced soon. We got this information from very reliable source. You have 30 more days to file your I-485.

    Thank you for your patience.




    hairstyles margaret bourke white. funny golf_16. dbz super saiyan 3 vegeta. hot
  • dbz super saiyan 3 vegeta. hot


  • genius
    11-20 09:18 PM
    Should we mail paulmcd@cmp.com (Paul McDougall )of information Week.

    See: http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=194700008&subSection=All+Stories




    eastindia
    04-22 09:28 AM
    So basically you are saying you cannot sue the people responsible for greencard problem.

    I think the only option left is to either sue God or sue yourself for your bad luck.




    anandrajesh
    05-04 01:59 PM
    Hi Madhuri,

    Do you have any more information regarding this.
    I am in the same boat .
    My LC got approved through perm in my 6th year
    and I140 applied and pending .
    6th year expires in Sept06.

    Any help is greatly appreciated.

    You can get your H1 extended based on Approved Labor / Pending Labor for 365 days. You get H1 extensions in 1 yr increments. If your 140 is approved as well then you get your H1 in 3 yr increments.

    I got my labor/140 done and my 6th Yr H1 is expiring Aug 31 and i shld be eligible for 3 yr extension due to Visa Number Unavailability.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment